<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Stuffed Dog</title>
      <link>http://stuffeddog.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:22:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>We are fine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me I should post something here. Mollie and I were both on campus at Virginia Tech yesterday during the shootings. We didn't know the extent of things until well after everything was over and we had been sent home. We're all fine, a little shell-shocked, but okay. This is a horrible event. I don't really know what else to say.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/328.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/328.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:22:13 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>You gotta try this one plugin, it&apos;ll change your life I swear</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rc3.org/2007/02/the_noscript_li.php">Rafe has recently started</a> using the <a href="http://noscript.net/">NoScript plugin for Firefox</a> and he points out how different it makes the browsing experience to have Javascript be a per-site optional thing. I've had the same experience. Surfing ad-support sites without NoScript installed can be a miserable experience. With NoScript the web is (mostly) fast, clean, and usable again. I don't really have anything to add to what Rafe already put well, but I just wanted to note how much I agree with his assessment.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/327.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/327.html</guid>
         <category>Digital Revolution</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:05:04 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Wisdom of Matthew Yglesias</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.matthewyglesias.com/archives/2006/12/the_low_price_of_power/">The wisdom of Matthew Yglesias</a>: "We must do what it takes to succeed whatever the cost. Always suppressed is the proviso -- whatever the cost <i>to other people</i>."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/326.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/326.html</guid>
         <category>Quotable Quotes</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:27:18 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>DRM vs Success</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Nick Carr makes a much-linked-to and persuasive argument that <a href="http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/12/curtains_for_mu.php">the practical reality of DRM is more about controlling the means of distribution</a> of digital music than it is about preventing copying. The fact is, illegally shared MP3s are available and will continue to be available no matter what the industry does about DRM. That being the case, there are only two realistic ways to sell music online, either some PlaysForSure scheme from Yahoo or Napster or Real, or via the iTunes Music store (okay, Zune is a third option).</p>

<p>But under any of these regimes, the music industry has very little control. But they don't have much of a choice either, since users aren't going to sign up for five or six different services to get the music they want. Since the iPod has more than 70% of the market share, there's almost no way around going that route.</p>

<p><b>Unless</b> the labels start selling MP3s. Every digital music player will play MP3s. Once you go this route, you can sell the music yourself, and your customers don't have to worry about whether your service is compatible with their players. Buying direct from the label would ensure correct metadata, consistent quality, and universal availability that the pirate networks can't match.</p>

<p>Piracy is going to happen no matter what. That's a matter of enforcement; there's no way to DRM your way out of that. Simultaneously, I think YouTube has shown more clearly than ever that putting up with some level of "infringement" can actually be very very good for your product. In the end, DRM-less media can open up a whole new world of freedom for artists, labels, and consumers alike. Instead of wasting our time and energy on valueless roadblocks, we should be opening the doors to see what the future can do for us.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/325.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/325.html</guid>
         <category>Digital Revolution</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:43:43 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Wisdom of Jim Henley II</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://highclearing.com/index.php/archives/2006/12/04/5682">The wisdom of Jim Henley</a>: "Cripes, it’s worse than even I thought: our government is like the callers to a sports talk radio station."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/324.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/324.html</guid>
         <category>Quotable Quotes</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:12:30 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Wisdom of Kevin Drum</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_12/010315.php">The wisdom of Kevin Drum</a>: "It's hard to imagine a more disastrous end to a disastrous war. For that reason, I suspect this proposal will be adopted."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/323.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/323.html</guid>
         <category>Quotable Quotes</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:32:07 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Wii vs PS3: The Definitive Guide</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Onion has <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/55794">your definitive guide</a> to this season's newest game consoles. What's the key difference? The Wii senses motion; the PS3 senses fear.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/322.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/322.html</guid>
         <category>Games</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:27:45 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Reason Enough to Buy a Wii</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Even if I wasn't excited by the thought of personally playing the games, moments like this, watching my daughter really get into Wii Boxing, are worth the price of the console and then some:</p>

<p><embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" align="middle" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-9146268874838963440&hl=en" quality="best" bgcolor="#ffffff" scale="noScale" salign="TL"  FlashVars="playerMode=embedded"> </embed></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/321.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/321.html</guid>
         <category>Games</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:53:53 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Great Moments in Projection</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A leaked memo from National Security Council chief Stephen Hadley:<blockquote>The information he receives is undoubtedly skewed by his small circle of [...] advisers, coloring his actions and interpretation of reality. His intentions seem good when he talks with Americans, [...] But the reality on the streets of Baghdad suggests [he] is either ignorant of what is going on, misrepresenting his intentions, or that his capabilities are not yet sufficient to turn his good intentions into action.</blockquote>Turns out, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/29/world/middleeast/29mtext.html">he isn't talking about Bush</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/320.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/320.html</guid>
         <category>Our Wacky Government</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:51:48 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Who Ya Gonna Subsidize?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.highclearing.com">Jim Henley</a> is taking the week off of work to ... blog a whole lot apparently. Anyway, as one of the smartest political bloggers out there, heavy blogging from Mr Henley means tons of good thoughtful reading material for the world.</p>

<p>Jim tackles one of my personal long-time favorite hobbyhorses today in discussing the problem of bringing good, low cost grocery shopping to poor urban neighborhoods. Turns out that both government and major grocery chains are too inflexible and bureaucratic to deal effectively with the complexities of integrating into older, denser neighborhoods. Too often in situations like these, the government's power of eminent domain is abused to force landowners to sell against their will to a developer too lazy to do the hard work of assembling a large plot of land or creatively designing developments around problem properties. The existing smaller stores can't compete on price with the big chain so why would anyone argue that the neighborhood is better off without the use of the government's power to force the turnover of land at favorable prices to the chain? Well, <a href="http://highclearing.com/index.php/archives/2006/11/28/5652">as Jim points out better than I could</a>, if you're going to subsidize someone, why not the people who are already serving the neighborhood?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/319.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/319.html</guid>
         <category>Our Wacky Government</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:55:46 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Wisdom of Mark Liberman</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003832.html">The wisdom of Mark Lilberman</a>: "when talking to the press, never mention Eskimos and their words for snow."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/318.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/318.html</guid>
         <category>Quotable Quotes</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:47:17 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Zelda vs the Mini Games</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>So I'm playing Twilight Princess and I realize that it's been a really long time since I've beaten a console Zelda game. I played and beat the original Zelda, Zelda II, and A Link to the Past on SNES, but Ocarina of Time came along and I never made it through. I didn't even play Majora's Mask, and Wind Waker's sailing bored me early on; plus focusing on Zelda with a toddler in the house is a lot harder, as it turns out.</p>

<p>I wondered how much story I had missed (not that continuity between games is important in any way), so I checked out the Wikipedia entries for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocarina_of_time">Ocarina</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_Waker">Wind Waker</a> and well, wow. It turns out I never really made it past the introductory quest-for-these-three Xs that you have to pass before the game sets you off on the real find-these-seven other-Xs. In other words, I doubt I played more than 15% of either game.</p>

<p>Thinking back, I never played much more of Metroid Prime 2 or Super Mario Sunshine, and I got further but never finished the original Metroid Prime. Is the last big Nintendo game I completed really Super Mario 64?</p>

<p>Anyway, I don't know if I expect to play through this latest Zelda or not, but score one for games that don't require such time commitment. The Wii's surfeit of minigame-loaded titles is looking awfully nice these days.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/317.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/317.html</guid>
         <category>Wii</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:17:52 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Wisdom of Matt Haughey</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://a.wholelottanothing.org/2006/11/27/a-broken-tv-tastes-like-eating-crow/">The wisdom of Matt Haughey</a>: "So I guess the moral of the story is you should really use those little leash things and I’m a bigger spazz than I thought."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/316.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/316.html</guid>
         <category>Wii</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:05:34 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Wisdom of Jim Henley</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://highclearing.com/index.php/archives/2006/11/27/5640">The Wisdom of Jim Henley</a>: "It can be very hard for Hulk to know just whom to smash sometimes."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/315.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/315.html</guid>
         <category>Quotable Quotes</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:03:30 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Get On Your Soapbox</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rc3.org/2006/09/soapbox.php">Rafe pointed out</a> this <a href="http://soapboxit.com">slick community review site</a> (built with <a href="http://www.rubyonrails.com">Rails</a>!). What's cool about it is that you can point it to your blog feed and it will import appropriately tagged posts as new reviews, so you don't have to remember one more place to post stuff. I can see that idea catching on fast, even if the site itself doesn't.</p>

<p>Their <a href="http://soapboxit.com/info/about">choice of implementation</a> is interesting though. Just add an empty span tag with a particular class (indicating a postive or negative review) to your post content. Isn't this what <a href="http://www.w3.org/RDF/">RDF</a> is for?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/57.html</link>
         <guid>http://stuffeddog.com/archives/57.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:25:13 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
